Chuck Connors, soi-disant boucle
Afficher plus
Afficher plus
,jpeg/013/563/082/v2/1280x720.203.jpg)
,jpeg/004/315/254/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/004/353/601/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/016/724/026/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/000/331/518/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/014/883/218/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/002/093/294/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/000/858/287/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/005/742/150/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/004/325/330/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/002/173/003/1280x720.2.jpg)
Commentaires
24
H
hardguyinco il y a 2 mois
interesting, I had to silence the music to watch it.
Répondre
ETXUCM il y a 3 mois
It's Chuck Connors at an early age.. some say this man is not tall as Chuck but you can't go by that because the other man could have been tall too.. what's the chances of two different men with the same facial features, square jaw, chin and left handed going to be, yes it's him.
Répondre
E
edgysir il y a 3 mois
I love when the top positions my faggot ass by putting my ankles on his shoulders. Not much has changed...
Répondre
O
omagarah il y a 4 mois
a sore asshole for sure
Répondre
K
KamikazeeDrone il y a 4 mois
Based on hair, jaw, and chin, I would say that is Chuck Connors. It would have been helpful if the cameraman had been about 30 feet closer to the action.
Répondre
chuckmmsucks il y a 9 mois
Nice rifle man!
Répondre
C
cewriter360 il y a 1 an
dude is not tall enough
Répondre
J
japanjack il y a 1 an
No not him. He was tall over 6’4. And he went from pro athlete to actor so didn’t need to cash.
Répondre
Vaka il y a 1 an
Great fuck! Very naturalistic. A damn shame this print is on its last legs. If there is a better print from the '70s I'd love to see it. Is it Connors? Height, build and general facial structure are certainly similar, but similar doesn't make it so. Either way, this "Chuck" certainly has wood!
Répondre
phredphat il y a 2 ans
doesnt work like that
Répondre Commentaire original
